Matters of opinion that enables me to understand or make some sense of my country- Malaysia

In this Umno family dynamic, those who attack its members are the enemy, and
those under attack are heroes. The greater the criticism of a particular
minister from outside Umno, the higher the status of the individual within
Umno. This works in reverse to normal logic, where more attacks weakens a
candidate.

Those attacked are the heroes of the party, even when they are acting in
manners that most observers would potentially see as illogical, unethical,
dangerous and even comical in a tragic sort of way.
__________________________________________

Umno polls a dysfunctional family affair
Bridget Welsh
The Umno party elections last weekend and this Saturday will decide
the leaders for the country, well at least until GE14. Umno party elections
have traditionally been the venue to set the course for Malaysia’s future
and the decisions this month are equally significance.

The two leadership positions – president and deputy president – have been
decided as a result of months of deal-making and accommodation on the part
of Prime Minister Najib Razak. He effectively avoided a challenge and
sweetened the deal by offering the Bumiputera Economic Empowerment (BEE), an
Umno contract-oriented affirmative action policy.

Every other contest – from youth and women’s wings to division chiefs – was
up for grabs. Last weekend saw the election of Najib’s allies to the Wanita,
Youth and Puteri wings. These leaders have at best a mixed record in their
positions, with leaders such as Shahrizat Abdul Jalil openly tainted.

The run-up to the polls has been disheartening – full of racial diatribes,
policy reversals on issues of reform and void of meaningful engagement with
the real issues facing Malaysia. Generous views excuse the actions as
electioneering, while those more critical harden their disdain over a party
that they perceive has moved from statesmanship to sink-the-ship.

How can we understand why Umno is moving in a direction so far away from its
statesman history? Will there be any leaders elected that the more than the
30 percent who voted for Umno respect? Is there any hope of reform from
within? What helps us understand the outcome of the elections?

Simplistically, analysts point to the role of Dr Mahathir Mohamad,
positioning himself as a behind-the-scenes challenger to Najib. They paint
the victories last weekend as wins for Najib and victory of ‘liberals’,
missing many underlying dynamics in the party.

This election is much more than the product of Najib versus Mahathir as it
involves psychology, financial interests and personal ties.

Umno’s reverse psyche

Umno lives in its own world, a world that is closely knit together in its
own fabric and colours. While it co-exists with others, Umno members (often
like the opposition as well) speak to one another and reinforce their own
world view of contemporary Malaysia. They are a family, often tied together
with close personal links through marriage and school networks, especially
at the elite levels.

There are now multiple generations of intertwined family networks that play
out during the party polls. Elite families have become deeply entrenched
across generations. Even as the number of delegates has reached 145,000, the
bonds between Umno members run deep – from the Biro Tatanegara (BTN)
training to the shared experiences in a particular Umno wing and also in
business as partners and competitors.

In this Umno family dynamic, those who attack its members are the enemy, and
those under attack are heroes. The greater the criticism of a particular
minister from outside Umno, the higher the status of the individual within
Umno. This works in reverse to normal logic, where more attacks weakens a
candidate.

As criticism is piled on Umno leaders Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and Ali Rustam, for
example, their odds to win a vice-presidency have increased. The same could
be said for Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin, whose criticism in the
run-up to polls only boosted his victory.

Those attacked are the heroes of the party, even when they are acting in
manners that most observers would potentially see as illogical, unethical,
dangerous and even comical in a tragic sort of way.

The creation of heroes within Umno reflects the contemporary psyche of the
party, which is premised on defending the Malay community from attack. Umno
has built its foundation on fear and insecurity in its ranks, especially
under the leadership of Mahathir.

Thus it is not a surprise when it acts in such a pattern by stoking fear and
harping on the failures of the Malay community. Little has centred on the
achievements and the successes of Malays, which deserve attention. Even less
has centred on confidence and community among Malays, all elements that
should be valued and appreciated.

The forces of negativity overshadow the positive messages in the
contemporary Umno psyche. This negativity is reinforced by the reality that
Umno does not have the support of the majority of Malaysians, its reputation
is among the lowest of all the political parties nationally, and despite its
efforts in GE13 it did not gain a larger share of the popular vote.

Yet, how they view the last GE is conflicted and also a reverse to general
logic. Rather than seeing the weaknesses in support and the lack of
legitimacy of their party, Umno members see GE13 as their victory; they no
longer need non-Malay parties to hold power and their share of the seats is
larger. Some even go as far to suggest that they have ‘bested’ the Chinese –
characterising this community as the enemy.

These outlooks are rooted in their own Umno logic, a view of the world that
is in denial of the decaying base of support for Umno and a party in deep
trouble. For the Umno family – all is okay, or at least portrayed as such.

Accommodating ‘Sugar Daddy’ Najib

The party’s outlooks are reinforced by interests. Most people join Umno for
the financial benefits of being in the party. This differs from the
ideological pull of recruitment of the past. Now even if you are concerned
with Malay rights, there are alternatives to joining Umno, such as Perkasa.
Umno members go where the money is, and the person who holds the money is
the premier.

After pouring out funds pre-GE13, Najib is now perceived himself as the
country’s biggest ‘sugar daddy’. He has openly made it clear that loyalty is
expected for rewards to be allocated with slogans such as ‘you help me, I
help you’ and some perceive that he has gone as far as to punish those who
do not support him with remarks such as the ‘Chinese tsunami.’

If you want sugar then you are expected to be sweet – or rather sweet to
Najib and people who are seen to have his favour. In this case, it is not
about ‘bees to the honey’ but the honey of the BEE.

It is thus not a surprise that his allies have won so far and are favoured
to win in the upcoming vice-president and supreme council elections this
weekend. The dynamic is such that Umno members want the financial rewards.
With a big pot of possible contracts on offer, it is not in the interest of
those in the system to rock the boat.

What has enhanced the power of Najib and the incumbents in general is the
change in the electoral system to more delegates. Judging by the number of
complaints from last weekend, money politics continues to be prominent and
the advantage lies with the multi-million war chests of the incumbents.
Those in the middle or less well-off are being squeezed out in the direct
payoffs.

There is also a more ‘democratising’ element in the campaign. In earlier
Umno polls, targeted financial rewards would be primarily spent to woo the
chosen delegates. Now money politics has partially moved away from the
direct payments to more mass dinners and shared rewards, at least on the
part of those who lack the comparative resources to compete with the
incumbent war chests.

For many in the contest, especially fresh faces, it is just too expensive to
pay off everyone. This has significantly weakened the power of warlords in
the party at the state levels and non-incumbent contenders, heightening the
position of those already in office, the centre and Najib’s influence.

Democratising the party elections has ironically strengthened the power of
the status quo and the existing hierarchy. The end result is that more
people circle around the promise of rewards from the centre and those in
position, especially the sugar daddy.

Powerful godfathers

A third factor involves history and former leaders. While Umno members have
a tradition of changing loyalties to accommodate the situation of the
present rather than the past, as happened in 1998-99 and is happening now,
the past still plays a role in shaping outcomes. Considerable power rests
with the godfathers, who mobilise their loyalists and whose members are
loyal to them for putting them into positions of power.

Mahathir is the ever powerful don, who has branded the party in his racial
outlook and legacy of money politics. In every state, he effectively played
divide and rule to maintain his position. Yet, his direct hold on the party
has waned with 10 years out of office and the slow regeneration that is
happening within Umno.

Despite his stature, Mahathir was clearly the loser in last weekend’s
results. He tapped into an old family battle between Sanusi Junid and
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in backing the challenger to Abdullah’s son-in-law
Khairy, Akhramsyah Sanusi, who was soundly defeated.

Another possible loss is also on the cards. His son appears not to even have
the support of a majority of delegates in his own state of Kedah, as many
see Mukhriz Mahathir’s rise as premature and view his record in the party
not in fitting with the credentials of a vice-presidency as he has not
served in senior party leadership positions or government before GE13.

The campaign is still ongoing and tight Umno polls such as the VP race
usually come down to the last 24 hours, and to the flow of ringgit noted
above. Mahathir will have to play his last cards to secure his son in power,
or face the reality of his declining influence. Ironically, Mahathir faces
the challenge of the legacy he left behind – money politics.

Many analysts do not appreciate the role of another don, Abdullah Badawi. A
large share of the current delegates are more beholden to Abdullah rather
than Mahathir himself. Even as Abdullah’s reputation within Umno is mixed,
with him receiving much of the blame for the loss of the party’s position
and the 2008 election results, those in the leadership positions remain
quietly loyal to Abdullah. They remember who ousted whom from office.

Najib’s success can be seen as a product of the decision to ally with
Abdullah people in his cabinet selection and in the run-up to the party
polls. The reality is that the Abdullah factor weakens those seen as close
to Mahathir and his allies. This Najib-Abdullah alliance is targeted to
offset any possible challenge to the existing leadership and consolidate
Najib’s position within the party.

Dysfunctionality now the norm

The outcome in Umno polls has to be understood within these lens of the
party reverse psychology, financial interests and allies with powerful
ever-present godfathers of the past.

The end result, however, is that Umno does not necessarily produce the
caliber of leadership that Malaysians deserve, as the sources for new blood,
outside of the elite and favoured allies, is minimal. The status quo appears
to be reigning.

Sadly, concerns about character and corruption persist. Any belief that
reform from within the party is evaporating, if it is even being considered
at all. Additional democratising measures within the party polls have not to
date transformed the leadership slate, but consolidated those in power.

The younger generation within Umno is being encouraged to accept the
standard rules of the game rather than reform them. It is important to
appreciate that none of the major contenders for senior positions within
Umno is projecting a genuine message of reform or engaging in a practice of
reform, as seen with the persistent issues of money politics.

While the results of the key competitive races will come in next week, the
lessons from the Umno polls so far is that dysfunctionality is now the norm,
as the interests of family have been imposed on the country.
———————————————————-
DR BRIDGET WELSH is associate professor of political science at Singapore
Management University

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: